One’s of psychological, interpersonal, and neuropsychological features that distinguish

One’s nature is
defined by how they are born. When humans are born, they cry, it is in their
nature. Similarly, it is in humans nature to want to protect themselves. But in
the case of serial killers the question posed is whether they are born with the
innate sense to want to kill. Some have argued that all humans have the ability
to kill when they are born, and this, in a sense is true. All human beings have
the ability to kill, but that ability is not always used. Most murders are
crimes of passion. According to the FBI database, 74 percent of murders are committed
by people who knew the victim. These murders are based off of personal reasons but
usually involve one person. Serial killers kill based off of personal reasons,
but the main difference is that they are killing just for themselves and are
killing strangers. Mental illness can also be considered a part of nature, as
it is widely believed that those who have mental disorders are born this way. Unfortunately,
many serial killers suffer from psychopathy, or in some cases, sociopathy.

Neither psychopathy or sociopathy are considered mental disorders by the
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Although it is not considered a mental
illness, I would like to insist that psychopathy is something a person is born
with. Psychopaths are “a person who demonstrates a discernable cluster of psychological,
interpersonal, and neuropsychological features that distinguish him or her from
the general population.” The father of American brain science, Benjamin Rush, recorded
having patients who showed “natural mysterious good wickedness”. The
first individual to really present the expression “psychopathic” was
German systematists Robert Koch. This condition was the essential region
important to Hervey Cleckley. Cleckley was one of the first to research this phenomenon,
and wrote a book called and The Mask of Rational Soundness in 1941. This book is
thought to be the most complete book composed regarding the matter. Cleckley
included 30 singular cases in the examination. From this examination, Cleckley
built up a rundown of 16 qualities that developed over and over inside the
examples. Cleckley attested that the psychopathic identity was experiencing a
solid disassociation amongst feeling and discernment and that this brokenness
made them neglect to acknowledge a considerable lot of their background. From
various perspectives, the patients were simply living by mirroring the
practices that others display in different circumstances. These patterns are as
follows: Superficial charm and intelligence, no delusions and other signs of
irrational thinking, no nervousness or psychoneurotic manifestations, unreliability,
untruthfulness and insincerity, lack of remorse and shame, antisocial behavior,
poor judgment and failure to learn by experience, pathologic egocentricity and capacity
for love, general poverty in major affective reactions, specific loss of
insight, unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations, fantastic and
uninviting behavior with drink and sometimes without it, suicide rarely carried
out, sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated,  failure to follow any life plan (Checkly,1941).

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

These trais all occurred naturally, but what about the nurture factor? Children
are most susceptible to change in their formative years. These years tend to be
the ages of 2 to 8 years old. Children are formed by their experiences at home
and at school with peers. There are many types of parenting  and all of them