Faith GriffinMr. ConklinUS History II22 December 2017The Constitution Never

Faith GriffinMr. ConklinUS History II22 December 2017The Constitution Never Lies Throughout history gun control has been a very controversial topic in society and politics. In many recent events, guns have played a major factor concerning mass shootings, mental illnesses, and acts of terror. In an article, Peterson said “The United States has just under half of all the firearms accounted for in the world” (Pettersson). The current legal regulations in place for gun control is decided by individual states. In Massachusetts the gun laws regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms. It is legal to purchase a gun with a permit, and maintain a license in order to own it. It is not necessary, however, to have a registration for the firearm. Eilperin stated that “Before Barack Obama left office, he stated it would be his final mission to clear up the controversy on gun control, and enact more strict rules concerning the purchase and possession of firearms” (Eilperin). More liberal viewers argue that the less guns there are circulating the streets, the less crime and deaths there would be. In today’s world, President Trump has vowed to loosen the laws that President Obama enacted during his presidency, meaning he would counteract his law wanting more background checks (Reinhard). The most reasonable way to keep guns in rightful people’s hands without over regulating the sales, possession, and usage of guns is to increase background checks on those buying and selling firearms. In order to protect oneself, guns should be permitted in almost every state because it is part of the second amendment, background checks allow guns to be placed in proper hands and it helps in a situation of self defense. The constitution contains amendments that help to enforce laws and rules to make the United States a safer place. The second amendment is the right to bear arms, meaning people have the right to own weapons to protect himself against anything harmful. There is a large amount of controversy about whether or not this amendment is meant for the United States as a whole or if it is for an individual person. Despite the controversy, the amendment still stands strong in allowing people to protect themselves with a gun. If people were not allowed the chance to own a gun, it is a violation of there second amendment. Court cases have been fought for this, as well as against. The District of Columbia vs Heller case, concluded that the second amendment protects an individual’s rights to possess a gun. Therefore, if a state does not permit guns, they are stripping a person of their rights. It may not be directly, but by not doing so, it gives them no way of protecting themselves in the face of danger. Often times, states and people of higher power are concerned about citizens owning guns because they are afraid of the consequences. There have been many times where there are mass shootings in places like schools and other public vicinities. However, gun control laws do not lessen the crime around them. If rules are set in place that ban guns, it makes those who want to act on their violent thoughts more likely to because they feel even more eager to rebel against laws set in place. The only thing to stop crime, is to lessen the amount of unfit people from owning guns. This can be done to look at a person’s background, criminal reports and any other information that would potentially pose a threat of possible bad usage of guns. These background checks should not only check the one trying to obtain a gun, but those  around the person to ensure that there are no dangers that could evolve once the person gets the gun. One example of where this would have been helpful, is the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting. In an article written by CNN, it states that the “weapons found at the scene were legally purchased by Nancy Lanza” (CNN). Since Adam Lanza was able to steal his mother’s gun from her, he went to an elementary school and killed twenty children and six adults, as well as putting fear in everyone involved. Everyday, the background checks are getting better and better, especially after incidents involving mass shootings like the one at Sandy Hook. There is a certain extent that gun control laws can go, before they take away everyone’s rights to protect themself. The reason that this happens, is because the background checks have not been successful in the past. With new technology, however, it enables states to do immense research and helps to ensure that the gun is being placed in the right hands. Had there been better checks at the time of the Sandy Hook shooting, then it may have been found that Adam Lanza might of had a mental disability making him unable to use a gun, even though it was not his. States need to be open and willing to make their background checks more advanced to allow citizens to safely own a gun in the case of an emergency.Often times people will break into homes and cause the owners enough fear where the only thing they can do is defend themselves. The general idea of defending oneself is to beat up or hurt the opposing person to break free for one’s own safety. The most common reason why people own guns, is in order to protect themselves and their families from situations like this. In an interview with Thomas Griffin, he stated “people should be able to own any type of gun they want if they choose to protect themselves in that specific way” (Griffin, Thomas). Guns are very dangerous weapons but anyone without a criminal record or with a mental disability should be able to have possession of a gun if they feel it is necessary for their safety. After constantly hearing about break ins, random attacks, kidnappings, murders, rapes and assaults, people should have the right to own their own firearm in order to protect themselves. When gun control laws are put in place, it quickly takes away one of the easiest ways of self defense. Owning a gun is easier to use as protection than having to fight with one’s bare hands. Because more often than not, the opposer will have a gun of his own. Not only that but when someone is in utter shock, it is easier to pull a trigger than to get up and fight. Although many people are for gun control, there is still a good amount of people that always argue against it. People will argue that the second amendment does not give an individual the right to own a gun but that it allows the state or country as a whole to own a number of guns. Many people think that creating more gun control laws will reduce the amount of deaths resulting from guns or any type of firearm. It is the states job, however, to set up good background checks in order to make sure crime does not happen. It is like the saying, guns do not kill people, people kill people. This means that having less guns in the world will not lessen crime. Rather that the less bad people in the world with guns will lessen it. In an interview with Mike Griffin, he said that “only law enforcement officials should be able to have possession of a handgun and that they should have access to more types of guns incase of a major incident” (Griffin, Mike). This is a common viewpoint of the opposing side. People feel that guns should only be allowed in the hands of law enforcement, and that nobody else should own a gun. These people argue that if more people were to own a gun then it would be much easier for anyone to steal the gun from the owner. Another common argument against guns, is that they are not used as much as some people argue. In an article written by Patrick Charles, he explained how “the statement argued by many people is that guns are rarely used for self defense”(Charles, Patrick J). Even though guns may not be used as often as some people believe, it is still extremely helpful and makes the owner feel safer when they have a gun. It is not fair for those who do end up needing a gun in a certain situation to not have one just because a law was set in place to take them away. Therefore, guns should be allowed in every state, despite popular opinions that they should not. Of the 29,618,300 violent crimes committed between 2007 and 2011, 0.79% of victims (235,700) protected themselves with a threat of use or use of a firearm”(Doeden, Matt.). In order to protect oneself, guns should be permitted in as many states as possible because it is part of the second amendment, background checks allow guns to be placed in proper hands and it helps in a situation of self defense. Gun Control is a very controversial topic in the world today and many people take it very seriously. The opinion on gun control is split up pretty evenly throughout the world right now, however, people should definitely be able to own a gun if they follow the rules in order to obtain one. Owning a gun not only is a part of someone’s second amendment, but it also allows someone to protect themselves in case of emergency. To take that away from someone, is unfair to the people who eventually find themselves in that situation with nothing to defend themselves with. If guns are allowed everywhere with the proper background checks, then it gives citizens a way of protecting themselves and their family when they need it the most. Works CitedCharles, Patrick J. “Gun Control.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 9 Jan. 2017,”Connecticut Shootings Fast Facts.” CNN, Cable News Network, 7 Dec. 2017,, Vic. Guns, Violence, and Teens. Enslow Publishers, 1997.Doeden, Matt. Gun Control: Preventing Violence or Crushing Constitutional Rights? Twenty-First Century Books, 2012.Doeden, Matt. Gun Control: Preventing Violence or Crushing Constitutional Rights? Twenty-First Century Books, 2012.Gottesman, Ronald, and Richard Maxwell Brown, editors. “Gun Control.” Violence in America, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1999. U.S. History in Context, Accessed Dec. 2017.”Gun Control –” Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States?,”Gun Control –” Should More Gun Control Laws Be Enacted in the United States?,, Richard A., editor. “Gun Control.” National Survey of State Laws, 6th ed., Gale, Detroit, 2008, pp. 157–173. U.S. History in Context, Accessed Dec. 2017