A lot of consumers are not paying any attention at all to the fact that the origin of the purchased products are from sweatshops .Even though most people are aware of the fact that a significant amount of human rights are being violated by some factories and companies, they often do not know which or simply do not think about it when shopping. Contradictory most westernalized people do not advocate a society where essentiel human rights are being violated. This contrast could possibly be clarified since most people are taking these important values for granted and do not realize that not every country shares this ideals, or the fact that not everyone can afford clothing without being made by cheap child labourers. And even more plausible; a lot of people, for an example, do not experience improving the circumstances in sweatshops as their duty or responsibility. Therefore it is necessary for a global leader, when trying to solve this problem and possibly reducing the purchasing of sweatshop manufactured products, to try to appeal to the sensibility of the customers. In order to change the behaviour of the consumer it is crucial to understand the behaviour of the consumer, and that is why knowledge of psychology is significant to solve this issue. Most of the assumptions that have been made so far are analyzed only from the point of view of the developed nations, therefore it is also important to be aware of the view of the developing nations, which is often surprisingly different. For an example, the countries who house sweatshops do not reduce the wages of the labourers without a reason. It is a fact that lower wages often means more profit, for that reason the countries with lower minimum wages attract foreign investors what will stimulate the economics and will help the poor escape poverty. As an example, China had enormous ‘benefits’ of the sweatshops and experienced an enormous decrease in the poverty headcount ratio in the population. Higher wages on the other hand will limit this necessary economic growth in order to prosper as a country and maybe even one day get rid of the sweatshops; hence in order to solve such an important problem like sweatshops a global leader must understand the motives of the country and moreover, the economical situation/state.Another cause of the high amount of sweatshops in developing countries and the reason that they still exist is simply that many labourers want to work in sweatshops. In countries like Bangladesh a life of crime is the most common alternative of working in sweatshops and besides, a job is better than no job. Also, due to the fact that working in sweatshops pays a lot more than any other possible employment in developing countries, sweatshops sometimes helps people to develop economically(rijker worden). Again, the knowledge of the economical intentions could be significant when dealing with this issue. It is also/merely a matter of politics when trying to fully exterminate the bad conditions and the violation of human rights in sweatshops. Generally, the national governments create the legal foundation of the labour laws in sweatshops. They decide, among other things, the minimum wage, working hours and the working conditions. Nevertheless it is often the sweatshop who does not follow this legislation, but when certain factories do not abide by those ‘laws’ an intervention at countries who house sweatshop could be drastic for the relationship between both nations. Therefore a global leader should take into account that you cannot always interfere directly with, for an example by sending an investigation team to inspect factories, home affairs.